The contemptible illusion of online advertisement

| | Comments (0)

What rational argument is there to claim that a business that delivers real value, with labor and material costs, should seek to derive all of its income via advertisement? the likely explanation would be a premise that human beings are targets for advertisers, and nothing else matters -- but then what is the advertisement for? other "free" businesses?

When did the human experience get reduced to becoming a recipient for advertisement?

No Such Thing as a Free Lunch: It seems that the tech industry has already forgotten the lessons of the first tech bubble and is back to the self-deluded idea that great technology alone is enough to survive over the long term. ... Shouldn't the restaurant owner just line his walls with advertisements and be happy?

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Radical Jinn published on October 1, 2007 10:34 AM.

65,535 was the previous entry in this blog.

Facebook is not good business is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.